From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D68615803E for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 06:25:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A3C112BC028; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 06:25:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85BA72BC028 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 06:25:02 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Council meeting 2024-01-14 - Call for agenda items From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 07:24:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-U5Q/o1hA+8ZCuqcK5+la" User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 4db08c5e-b9be-4053-879d-8aaba7d82669 X-Archives-Hash: 0329d854aededb9cdaccaa12e90b636b --=-U5Q/o1hA+8ZCuqcK5+la Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2024-01-02 at 22:37 +0000, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Mon, Jan 01, 2024 at 07:16:32PM -0800, John Helmert III wrote: > > > Agenda items from Infra: > ... > > > # Add hardware for ONLINE historical distfile archive=20 > > > Bug #834712 is a draft proposal to add a ONLINE historical distfile a= rchive > ... > > > There would also be a periodic backup into AWS S3 Glacier, able to > > > re-create the server if needed; > > Are we already using Glacier? Glacier itself presumably isn't libre, > > so I'm not sure how we should feel about it from the perspective of > > social contract depdendency requirements. > Yes, Infra already uses S3 and Glacier for backups specifically. It's > *NOT* in any hot path whatsoever, backups only for disaster recovery. So we're basically talking about using services of an extremely unethical company that can additionally randomly change princes to store backups that we never test because it would be too expensive to test them. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-U5Q/o1hA+8ZCuqcK5+la Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFGBAABCgAwFiEEx2qEUJQJjSjMiybFY5ra4jKeJA4FAmWU/bkSHG1nb3JueUBn ZW50b28ub3JnAAoJEGOa2uIyniQOul8H/AipLJzF5VXW1Fhf5y2+/l/g+DJdsnin 1fVczlXmscwXHCwPor2Kcj5ZFYyjqkGbF8epKVUiE4pIIYZ/9vT9jETs/j+/jGE2 wgQY70KJHt2thvqnxFIuaVM8UZkgcjJRaXhMXbb2ydXmYifDSuyveRBLLbeXu1SO LRf+LcO6ZZJ1kQIJTXOyzDqIdLtT8ZBTXe64MuUAeBvR7GwKHZKXFo2tc2WYy6Cg tCObC1W3O9Lt+in55ND/ZXeLm5f7RfqX7yZpdtYWbVGyTtW2Ct9XWpncVCzL56AV Elgn68ZIBRCBBBPRiRhUCYrOuqLFRC575gzqX7oXtAktA0uAGUBh8pM= =09wg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-U5Q/o1hA+8ZCuqcK5+la--