Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?

[Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org>]

2010/4/3 Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@gentoo.org>:
> Le samedi 03 avril 2010 à 12:50 +0300, Petteri Räty a écrit :
>> I don't think later is valid resolution. If there's a valid bug it just
>> means it's never looked at again. If the bug is not valid then a
>> different resolution should be used. So what do you think about
>> disabling later?
>
> You are trying to remove a valid status for a case that has been badly
> managed ??? Speaking for gnome herd, afaik, all bugs marked LATER are
> for the simple reason they will be done later and no other status would
> be fine expect REJECTED maybe, but we don't want to say that to the face
> of the reported like this do we ?

Thats why I think a bugzilla LATER keyword is just as effective; but
people doing bugzie searches would no longer exclude these types of
bugs on accident.

-A

>
> --
> Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@gentoo.org>
> Gentoo
>