From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NyMHf-00039V-QI for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2010 09:38:24 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E8E3E0CE5; Sun, 4 Apr 2010 09:38:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA52EE0CDD for ; Sun, 4 Apr 2010 09:38:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.130.46.197] (qiv5.kyla.fi [82.130.46.197]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7BC11B4036 for ; Sun, 4 Apr 2010 09:38:01 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4BB85E08.8050902@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2010 12:38:16 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fi; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090916 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch References: <4B9A936B.3070804@gentoo.org> <4BAE15A6.80101@gentoo.org> <20100327145156.GA16282@fury.skynet> <4BAE1F2E.40800@gentoo.org> <20100401222819.348511fb@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> In-Reply-To: <20100401222819.348511fb@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 OpenPGP: id=B8E4ECF0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigA89D1508D02D394DDE84965B" X-Archives-Salt: 9aabbe75-5d78-4628-bcd4-d048814a11a6 X-Archives-Hash: 3a32b2f706c04bd21613f3134b9f4105 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigA89D1508D02D394DDE84965B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04/01/2010 11:28 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 17:07:26 +0200 > Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: >=20 >> On 03/27/2010 04:51 PM, Alex Alexander wrote: >>> >>> The only reason I don't really like this is because it breaks >>> consistency. We have a ground rule, assign to maintainer, CC >>> arch(es). Why make it more complicated? I have a feeling people >>> will continue CCing arches out of habit. >=20 > +1. >=20 >> I don't think we should punish people for not doing it this way but >> consider it the preferred way when doing new bugs. The initial point >> here was to tell arches that assigning bugs directly to them is not >> wrong. >=20 > Not wrong, just annoying for the arch team in question. Before > resolving the bug report, you'd reassign to the maintainer and then > close it? Why change it around twice, or even once for that matter? >=20 >=20 I don't think I have ever suggested this or then I have been misunderstoo= d. Regards, Petteri --------------enigA89D1508D02D394DDE84965B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLuF4IAAoJEPeUsk245OzwkV4P/300/evohSHqn9dnbMVy4TGW XbsqNmxX5vxpIgmMjCKcO7AGapyPYKQNMm8CKKUf5F95I6UjrG+Z6q2/5+rCt7Td o1xQXRPPEIJrsJkmCqPjfa8MfnGTy4aw1R5QNKp7L0OM7ZXwJIaHsh73aBEeLzU+ ZjYLjYtIsxehXAegQ3CXwmyAo3H+FwxVX6Q/eAP10FIv4jyyu4vZTBPhaVybqmvg eWpRQsHgIwl+AgsZDmGUKSH/WZ0yMnJby25TeIIg8w6vPo58ufZdqvk13SZRl2gT Bds0hljUB6vhaHo6nIaP4GALvmcwrICusz2sKtOCNyFjKI6NheICPABbe53bLXYI 3uCPmGH375wjw0Fu2raAFsl3K6oC6bMESoeNUO994S9O/Msc2guqGJCGCAYNPtsR C0wvXBjdU9OABIUR9ZvMJhkvWixdPZ9wh/mMPwwBf+HOv82/wwk5P5oba7qw1t4+ NIB57E8gulFCuwM/ymt9eaU2Dp9WzfyaoDWgJ5DrTmgbMLz2KcqtbmuXicbc6Rap lDK6vCOdvSRfCrPcnpKtj4PQFHm5J4Qn3asvTV4YMM4p/D/xKdaicY3eye1ihz73 7CKIsijEfIHEPxFuAY87maIkzTed8d67hlPxAu+cw9/J9dqxB4BKRhwd6d+v0/4r nk5oEnPTIqq1edhEwJ5w =54u2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigA89D1508D02D394DDE84965B--