From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1O5jrw-0006CT-0m for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 18:14:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 72B62E087E; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 18:14:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr (smtp3-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.3]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 373C2E0859 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 18:14:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C0281811E for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:14:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (toz.strangled.net [82.232.126.136]) by smtp3-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D36E818062 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:14:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:14:04 +0200 From: Alexis Ballier To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits Message-ID: <20100424201404.32b5ad52@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4BD32D26.5090005@gentoo.org> References: <4BD32D26.5090005@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.9; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/V3ksITQNFITnDAE3d7QiV_."; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 74e9f1b4-8cc5-4f63-8ad1-d668583bb9db X-Archives-Hash: 0d7ebd53020331b50a8e8e0ec9e5732a --Sig_/V3ksITQNFITnDAE3d7QiV_. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:40:54 +0300 Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: > 17:34 < Betelgeuse> robbat2|na: how easy to it to prevent commits to > CVS if the commit message doesn't match a certain pattern? > 17:36 <@robbat2|na> go and checkout the CVSROOT and there should be an > example there > 17:37 < Betelgeuse> robbat2|na: Ok so doable then. Thanks. >=20 > What do you think about not allowing commits to eclasses without > mentioning an another developer who has reviewed and approved the diff > in the commit message? There's enough people on gentoo-dev for urgent > stuff too. no thanks; we already have the policy to require that major changes to broad impact eclasses have gone through -dev, no need to add more bureaucracy. Also, what will be the value of my opinion on changes on toolchain.eclass since I know nothing about it? Finally, find me someone able to review texlive-*.eclass changes. Alexis. --Sig_/V3ksITQNFITnDAE3d7QiV_. Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkvTNOwACgkQvFcC4BYPU0o43wCfQsvRwN+PMm+80iTqXAFpXuUB Rw8AnR1d/0pbNTQm8PVF6JSGiOsewRIz =Scuo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/V3ksITQNFITnDAE3d7QiV_.--