From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1O0jI8-0008Hv-8R for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 22:36:40 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 57E59E08E5; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 22:36:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF688E0843 for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 22:36:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 967531B4112 for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 22:36:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.918 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.918 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.319, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mklt6R5d1jWO for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 22:36:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA9211B41F8 for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 22:36:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O0jHl-0005Ou-3L for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 00:36:17 +0200 Received: from s0106001f3b27dbf6.mj.shawcable.net ([70.64.205.120]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 00:36:17 +0200 Received: from dirtyepic by s0106001f3b27dbf6.mj.shawcable.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 00:36:17 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Ryan Hill Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 16:38:46 -0600 Message-ID: <20100410163846.782e121c@gentoo.org> References: <4B9A936B.3070804@gentoo.org> <4BAE15A6.80101@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/G0590nYmBN1Dm3s.gnu5TQ1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: s0106001f3b27dbf6.mj.shawcable.net X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.9; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Archives-Salt: 3d7006bb-8d6d-4edd-b3af-96c4f78cdb7d X-Archives-Hash: dc1e15eca549b4fbc6d65fd98112bf54 --Sig_/G0590nYmBN1Dm3s.gnu5TQ1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 16:26:46 +0200 Petteri R=E4ty wrote: > On 03/12/2010 09:18 PM, Petteri R=E4ty wrote: > > There seems to be two different schools on who to assign a keywording > > bug with only a single arch. I have myself assigned it to the arch in > > question but there's a difference of opinion here: > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D272160#c5 > > Let's get agreed on a single approach and I will add a note here: > > http://devmanual.gentoo.org/keywording/index.html > > I naturally support the approach I have been doing as I think the arch > > team is the one in charge. > >=20 > > Regards, > > Petteri > >=20 >=20 > So let's summarize for assigning to the single arch: >=20 > Against (and my comments on why they don't apply): > - Comments would only go to arch team after resolving: > * maintainer is still in Cc or Reporter > - Arch teams not in charge of fixing problems > * If problems come up they deserve a new bug as a dependency > * one bug per issue and a stabilization bug is about stabilization > - Maintainer being able to decide when to go stable > * Bug wranglers should still assign to maintainers for their ack > * The maintainer assigns it to the arch team >=20 > In support (and my comments in support): > - Can be used as a gentle reminder for slacker arches > - The arch teams are actually ones doing the work to resolve the bug > * As they are the ones to mark it as resolved it makes sense for them > to be the assignees >=20 > So based on this I propose that I will write this down in appropriate > places in to our documentation and commit a week from now. Please object > if you don't agree and we can discuss some more. You ignored my point about this being completely moot once we start using flags in bugzilla for arch teams. We'll have to change the policy then to the maintainer being the assignee anyways. --=20 fonts, by design, by neglect gcc-porting, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 --Sig_/G0590nYmBN1Dm3s.gnu5TQ1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkvA/foACgkQiqiDRvmkBmJbsQCgpaiaods9/0YLM4FBs8mxc3kW 7JoAoNLTlBp99DDA8Kp91KpR1Q1w8R0W =UfUN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/G0590nYmBN1Dm3s.gnu5TQ1--