From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1O04Bi-0001Wd-0H for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 02:43:18 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 267D4E0929; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 02:43:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from patrick-nagel.net (patrick-nagel.net [78.47.82.81]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C582AE08E9 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 02:42:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by patrick-nagel.net (Postfix, from userid 1015) id 84BAE9FC05A; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 02:42:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wang.localnet (unknown [114.218.18.124]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by patrick-nagel.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 924979FC03D for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 02:42:49 +0000 (UTC) From: Patrick Nagel To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Gentoo Wiki Project Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 10:42:40 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.2 (Linux/2.6.33-gentoo; KDE/4.4.2; x86_64; ; ) References: <20100408135105.49ca2e21@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20100408135105.49ca2e21@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1639626.m26yPfjECy"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201004091042.45496.mail@patrick-nagel.net> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.1 X-Archives-Salt: e592d199-ee62-4d0d-a8cc-8eea4fb9a3ed X-Archives-Hash: 0ec653dd6f72e2f671ee5a1dd46fb957 --nextPart1639626.m26yPfjECy Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On 2010-04-08 19:51 UTC Ryan Hill wrote: > On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 20:12:49 +0200 >=20 > Ben de Groot wrote: > > After the mostly positive feedback on the recent wiki discussion, we > > have now gone ahead, formed a preliminary team consisting of both > > users and developers, and put up a project page [1]. All constructive > > feedback on this new project is welcome. >=20 > why are we setting up a user wiki when a very popular one already exists?= =20 > it seems like a complete duplication of effort. i'm not saying don't do > it, i'm just baffled why we would. Well, one reason could be, that the "unofficial" one lost its whole databas= e=20 once, and there were other multiple multi-day outages in the past. I expect= an=20 official Wiki to have a reasonable availability and not losing most of the= =20 content, breaking links all over the net for months. Patrick. =2D-=20 Key ID: 0x86E346D4 http://patrick-nagel.net/key.asc =46ingerprint: 7745 E1BE FA8B FBAD 76AB 2BFC C981 E686 86E3 46D4 --nextPart1639626.m26yPfjECy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAku+lCUACgkQyYHmhobjRtQ7agCcDkkPDNViugnkNBjGhnwZjluW eNMAoJOwhyUxYWwJYNPyx/uHe3MGDje9 =XELW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1639626.m26yPfjECy--