From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NqPDB-0004Qh-GN for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:08:53 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D6991E0B2F; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:08:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpauth14.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpauth14.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.39]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 96CF7E08E5 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:08:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4822 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2010 11:08:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (94.66.146.38) by smtpauth14.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.39) with ESMTP; 13 Mar 2010 11:08:29 -0000 From: Markos Chandras To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:08:46 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.1 (Linux/2.6.32-zen6; KDE/4.4.1; x86_64; ; ) References: <4B9A936B.3070804@gentoo.org> <20100312214705.GA5761@linux1> In-Reply-To: <20100312214705.GA5761@linux1> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201003131308.46620.hwoarang@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: b6a44454-04a9-49e7-b6a3-d203e8f306e2 X-Archives-Hash: fe6d102109d2522713355786205917bb On Friday 12 March 2010 23:47:05 William Hubbs wrote: > On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 08:11:50PM +0000, Jeremy Olexa wrote: > > On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:18:03 +0200, Petteri R??ty > > > > wrote: > > > There seems to be two different schools on who to assign a keywording > > > bug with only a single arch. I have myself assigned it to the arch in > > > question but there's a difference of opinion here: > > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=272160#c5 > > > Let's get agreed on a single approach and I will add a note here: > > > http://devmanual.gentoo.org/keywording/index.html > > > I naturally support the approach I have been doing as I think the arch > > > team is the one in charge. > > > > The "problem" with assigning bugs to arch teams is when the user comments > > on the bug after it is resolved. If the arch team is CC'd, they remove > > themselves when done and any comments after the bug is closed goes to > > someone that is interested. If the arch team is assigned, then the > > comment basically goes to /dev/null. So, if we are to improve the user > > experience, assign to maintainer and CC arch team. > > This is a good enough reason for me to vote for assigning bugs to > maintainers and cc'ing arch teams. This is the way I was taught that > this should be handled, and this comment explains why. > > Since all the arch team does is stabilize or keyword, the maintainer > needs to know if other issues come up with the bug after it is closed. > > William I like that idea as well -- Markos Chandras (hwoarang) Gentoo Linux Developer Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org