From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ny4os-00083e-N1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 14:59:30 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7225EE0B37; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 14:59:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.libexec.de (guenther.libexec.de [85.214.114.28]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3145DE0B30 for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 14:59:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (guenther.libexec.de [127.0.0.1]) by mail.libexec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 500D82C701A5 for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 16:59:19 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at libexec.de Received: from mail.libexec.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (guenther.libexec.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5nKlCM985g7i for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 16:59:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.60] (p508AF9AD.dip.t-dialin.net [80.138.249.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: tobias) by mail.libexec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D74BC2C70073 for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 16:59:17 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Is Gentoo dying? From: Tobias Scherbaum To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1270305609.3243.0@NeddySeagoon> References: <1270305609.3243.0@NeddySeagoon> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-+BWjCbTGkqcHZBflysoW" Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2010 16:59:16 +0200 Message-ID: <1270306756.18734.39.camel@homer.ob.libexec.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.0.1 X-Archives-Salt: 31822c57-9188-4367-86a3-ee30e2688f0c X-Archives-Hash: f98196654568a576db29115259143766 --=-+BWjCbTGkqcHZBflysoW Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Samstag, den 03.04.2010, 15:40 +0100 schrieb Roy Bamford: > First, we need some metrics - the first step to controlling anything is= =20 > to measure it. So, how do you want to measure those metrics? I for one can't think of a useful algorithm which helps to identify understaffed or orphaned areas. Sure, one might take a look at the number of packages compared with open bugs for example - but in the end that still won't give you some useful metrics. If someone has a feeling somewhere helping hands are missing or an area is orphaned - that's the best "metrics" we can get. - Tobias --=20 Praxisbuch Nagios http://www.oreilly.de/catalog/pbnagiosger/ https://www.xing.com/profile/Tobias_Scherbaum --=-+BWjCbTGkqcHZBflysoW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAku3V8QACgkQX2bdwDDA8AUnPwCgoSVFWMVdEg4HjKfXT4H5qppX FDUAnjWmg10jyac/50x1ptGJjuh42xC5 =8pSV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-+BWjCbTGkqcHZBflysoW--